Wednesday, September 26, 2012

# 26 Economic Confidence Improves

This morning, from the AP.  I've added emphasis on individual state names.  Again, things are looking very looking for Obama--AS LONG AS VOTER SUPPRESSION ACTIONS BY REPUBLICAN STATE LEGISLATORS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DECREASE VOTER TURNOUT BY MILLIONS OF MINORITIES. Always this caveat. It's the wild card in the election, given that the polls are increasgingly showing Obama pulling away from Romney.

By ANNE D'INNOCENZIO and CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER | Associated Press 

A new survey of consumer confidence rose Tuesday to its highest level since February on expectations that hiring will soon pick up. And a separate report showed home values rising steadily, signaling sustained improvement in housing.

"This is like an opinion poll on the economy without the political parties attached," said John Ryding, chief economist at RDQ Economics, a consulting firm. The confidence survey "says people are feeling better. If so, they are less likely to vote for change."

The Conference Board's index of consumer confidence shot up in September. The jump surprised many economists because the most recent hiring and retail sales figures have been sluggish.

The increased confidence could help explain recent polls that show Obama with a widening lead over Mitt Romney in some battleground states.

The consumer confidence index is closely watched because consumer spending drives nearly 70 percent of economic activity. The index jumped from 61.3 for August to 70.3 for September. It remains well below 90, the level that is thought to signify a healthy economy.

Economists point to some key reasons why consumers have grown more confident.

(1) Stocks are up: The Standard & Poor's 500 stock index has surged nearly 15 percent this year.
(2) Gas prices have leveled off after rising for several months.
(3) The broad increase in home prices is likely giving would-be buyers more confidence. When prices rise, buyers don't worry so much that a home might lose value after they bought it.

National home prices rose 1.2 percent in July compared with a year ago, according to the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index released Tuesday. That was the second straight month in which year-over-year home prices have increased.

Some economists question whether the higher level of confidence is sustainable. They've seen the index spike briefly before since the Great Recession ended more than three years ago. Some say confidence could be affected by negative campaign ads that focus on the economy.

But others note that even a weak economy doesn't feel so bad to many consumers once it begins to make steady improvement.

"The economy is perceived in relative rather than absolute terms," noted St. Louis University political scientist and pollster Ken Warren.

Mark Vitner, a senior economist at Wells Fargo, suggests that former President Bill Clinton might have helped boost confidence with his rousing speech on Obama's behalf at the Democratic National Convention in early September. The Conference Board's consumer confidence survey was conducted Sept. 1-13.
Clinton "rekindled memories of better economic times" and assured voters that the U.S. economy was on the right track, Vitner said.

The consumer confidence survey polled 500 people. The part of the survey that gauges consumers' confidence in the economy now and the part that gauges their outlook for the next six months both rose. Consumers were much more optimistic about the short-term outlook for business conditions, employment and their financial situation.

The rising home prices could also help Obama's prospects. Prices are rising in many large cities in swing states such as Florida, Colorado, Michigan and North Carolina. Prices have risen 3.6 percent in Tampa, Fla., in the past year, for example. And they're up 5.4 percent in Denver, 6.2 percent in Detroit and 2.2 percent in Charlotte, N.C.

A Washington Post poll out Tuesday showed Obama leading Romney among likely voters in Ohio, 52 to 44 percent. The president also had a slight edge in Florida, 51 to 47 percent among those most likely to vote.

Obama is also gaining the upper hand on which candidate is better able to handle the economy. Registered voters in Ohio preferred Obama on the economy by 50 percent to 43 percent, and in Florida by 49 percent to 45 percent.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

# 25 Manufacturing Returns Home

Good news for the US economy, for job growth, and for the Obama campaign:

[ by  | Daily Ticker]
While the U.S. unemployment rate hangs high above 8%, manufacturing is one sector of the American economy that has seen substantial jobs growth over the last few years.
President Barack Obama said as much during his interview with 60 Minutes Sunday:
"The month I was sworn into office, we were losing eight hundred thousand jobs a month. We ultimately would lose nine million jobs during the height of that Great Recession. We came in, made some tough decisions....
And because of that we've now had thirty months of job growth, four and a half million new jobs, half a million jobs in manufacturing alone."
According to analysis by the Boston Consulting Group, manufacturing and supporting jobs will continue to grow by 5 million over the next decade. The firm previously projected a gain of 2 to 3 million jobs by 2020.

What's the main driver behind the rebirth in American manufacturing?

Rising production costs in other industrialized and developing nations, including labor and energy costs, makes manufacturing in the U.S. less expensive for American companies.

Key findings from the report include:
  • In less than three years, the U.S. will have a cost advantage of 5% to 25% over Germany, Italy, France, the U.K., and Japan in a number of industries, including machinery, chemicals, transportation equipment as well as electrical and appliance equipment.
  • America's natural gas boom from shale (commonly referred to as "fracking") has provided this country with some of the cheapest natural gas prices around the world. For the forceable future, natural gas prices will remain 50% to 70% cheaper in the U.S. versus Europe and Japan.
  • Labor costs in other developed economies will be 20% to 45% more expensive compared to the costs of hiring U.S. workers.
  • The U.S. could grab additional exports from the aforementioned nations to the tune of $130 billion annually.
  • Average manufacturing costs in China will only be 7% lower compared to in the U.S in 2015.




Some companies are already taking advantage of America's low-cost manufacturing environment. The following examples are cited in the BCG report:
  • Toyota (TM) plans to assemble its Camry models in Kentucky and Sienna minivans in Indiana for export to South Korea. Honda (HMC) and Nissan are also ramping up U.S. production.
  • Siemens (SI) is building gas turbines for export to the Middle East.
  • Rolls-Royce recently began producing aircraft engine parts in Virginia.


Monday, September 24, 2012

#24 Start yer engines

Obama's Surprising Constituencies...

Again, please read the following statistics with an eye open to Voter Suppression Laws.  If they are passed by state legislators, and upheld or not yet heard by the courts, the disenfranchisement of up to 10 million minorities could have a profound effect on the election.  If, on the other hand, the polls are accurate, Obama should win big.  Here's the article: 
-----     -----     -----

Mitt Romney's recent slide in several polls, including those in the battleground states of Ohio, Virginia and Florida, is troubling enough for the GOP. But, now the Republican nominee appears to be trailing President Barack Obama among a traditionally conservative constituency: NASCAR fans.

Obama leads Romney 49 to 42 percent among NASCAR enthusiasts, according to a new Zogby poll by JZ Analytics.

As the liberal blog PoliticusUSA.com pointed out, Romney was booed at the Daytona 500 in February during a campaign trip ahead of Super Tuesday.  NASCAR fans, though, have been known to boo politicians. Last fall, first lady Michelle Obama and Jill Biden, Vice President Joe Biden's wife, were booed when they served as grand marshals at a race in Miami.

The online poll of 860 likely voters conducted on Sept. 21 and 22 also found that Obama leads Romney 54 to 40 percent among military families.

Among Catholics, the president's edge—46 to 44 percent—is within the poll's 3.4 percent margin of error.

But among voters who "never attend a place of worship," Obama's lead over Romney is 63 to 26 percent.

Among voters who identified themselves as "social networkers," Obama is ahead of Romney 55 to 33 percent.

Overall, the president leads the GOP challenger 49 to 41 percent, according to the poll. Obama has a head start of 14 points among independents (46 to 32 percent), 33 points among moderates (60 to 27 percent), 36 points among 18- to 29-year-olds (65 to 29 percent), and 42 points among Hispanics (68 to 26 percent).

Of the 103 likely voters who identified themselves as African-American, 96 said they would vote for Obama—with none indicating they would back Romney.

There are a few voting blocs that favor Romney, according to the poll. Among born-again Christians, Romney leads Obama 48 to 40 percent. The former Massachusetts governor held the same lead among rural voters. Among voters who shop at Wal-Mart weekly, Romney is ahead of Obama 46 to 42 percent. And among those sympathetic to the tea party, Romney holds a 75 to 17 percent edge.

-----     -----     -----


# 23 Republican Sub Rosa

This morning's Reuters article (below) expresses concerns that a lot of us have: voter suppression laws.  In my earlier discussion of this phenomenon, I was aware of 17 states that had passed or were in process of passing such laws.  That number is now apparently up to 23.  Sneaky, sneaky, sneaky. Republican sub rosa shenanigans are politically motivated, and they're also potentially illegal.  But there may not be enough time to test their legality before election day.  The results could put a Republican back in the White House:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New voting laws in 23 of the 50 states could keep more than 10 million Hispanic U.S. citizens from registering and voting, a new study said on Sunday, a number so large it could affect the outcome of the November 6 election.

The Latino community accounts for more than 10 percent of eligible voters nationally. But the share in some states is high enough that keeping Hispanic voters away from the polls could shift some hard-fought states from support for Democratic President Barack Obama and help his Republican rival, Mitt Romney.

The new laws include purges of people suspected of not being citizens in 16 states that unfairly target Latinos, the civil rights group Advancement Project said in the study to be formally released on Monday.

Laws in effect in one state and pending in two others require proof of citizenship for voter registration. That imposes onerous and sometimes expensive documentation requirements on voters, especially targeting naturalized American citizens, many of whom are Latino, the liberal group said.

Nine states have passed restrictive photo identification laws that impose costs in time and money for millions of Latinos who are citizens but do not yet have the required identification, it said.

Republican-led state legislatures have passed most of the new laws since the party won sweeping victories in state and local elections in 2010. They say the laws are meant to prevent voter fraud; critics say they are designed to reduce turnout among groups that typically back Democrats.

Decades of study have found virtually no use of false identification in U.S. elections or voting by non-citizens. Activists say the bigger problem in the United States, where most elections see turnout of well under 60 percent, is that eligible Americans do not bother to vote.

Nationwide, polls show Obama leading Romney among Hispanic voters by 70 percent to 30 percent or more, and winning that voting bloc by a large margin is seen as an important key to Obama winning re-election.

The Hispanic vote could be crucial in some of the battleground states where the election is especially close, such as Nevada, Colorado and Florida.

For example, in Florida, 27 percent of eligible voters are Hispanic. With polls showing Obama's re-election race against Romney very tight in the state, a smaller turnout by Hispanic groups that favor Obama could tilt the vote toward the Republican.

Friday, September 21, 2012

# 22 "No Margin for Error"

Interesting article that appeared this morning--This is basically what we'll be doing over the next six and a half weeks.  I'm still saying (barring something currently not anticipated) that Obama will win big. 

On the other hand, I am a bit concerned about two things:
(1) Despite all the bad stuff that's come down in the Romney campaign, Mitt is still hanging close in the popular vote.  Does that mean there's a hard-core anti-Obama contingent out there?  Probably. Might some of it at least be latent (or not so latent) racism? Probably.  Might Romney overtake Obama in electoral votes?  Probably not.
(2) What is the status of Voter Suppression drives in the "battleground" states?  If those drives are successful, they could shift the electoral vote total significantly. I find troubling the fact that news has nearly dried up on those Voter Suppression drives; I much prefer knowing what their proponents are up to, than having so little new information. 

Today's online article: By Rick Klein, Amy Walter, Richard Coolidge & Sherisse Pham

While national polls show President Obama and Mitt Romney in a tight race, a closer look at the Electoral College map reveals that Romney's path to the White House is more of an uphill struggle than President Obama's.

Obama or Romney needs 270 electoral votes  to win the White House, and with the current state of the race,  Obama only needs to pick up 33 electoral votes to achieve victory, while Romney still needs 64.

The eight battleground states heading into the election are Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Wisconsin, Ohio, Virginia, New Hampshire, and Florida. The most important undecided states at play are Virginia with 13 electoral votes, Ohio with 18, and Florida with 29.

Assuming that Obama holds onto the states he is currently expected to win, he has a couple of paths that would secure the White House. In one scenario, if Obama wins Virginia and Ohio on election night,  bumping his tally to 268 electoral votes, he would need to snatch just one other small state, such as New Hampshire or Colorado, to cross the victory line.  In an alternative scenario, he could afford to lose Virginia and Ohio all together, so long as he wins Florida.  With Florida's 29 votes, he'd be just 4 electoral votes from crossing the 270 threshold.

For Romney, on the other hand, there is no alternative path to victory so long as the current electoral projections hold true. It is essential that he win Florida, with its 29 electoral votes, plus Ohio or Virginia to bring the electoral vote tally into a dead heat with President Obama -- turning Election Day into a late night.

ABC News' Jordyn Phelps contributed to this report.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

# 21 Just In Time...?


Is this the "turnaround" that the Democrats need to fuel a runaway election victory? Can I continue to mix diverse metaphors in a single sentence? I've added bold-fonts to the final four paragraphs, for variety and emphasis.  This may indeed be the beginning of a six week news cycle of improving economic data.  I hope.

[from Reuters via Yahoo! News]:

Housing starts rose less than expected in August as groundbreaking on multifamily home projects fell, but the trend continued to point to a turnaround in the housing market.

The Commerce Department said on Wednesday housing starts increased 2.3 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 750,000 units. July's starts were revised to show a 733,000-unit pace instead of the previously reported 746,000.

Economists polled by Reuters had forecast residential construction rising to a 765,000-unit rate. Compared to August last year, residential construction was up 29.1 percent....

"We continue to see positive signs emerging from the housing market, suggesting that the entire market, not just individual submarkets, are stabilizing and steadying themselves for future growth."

Housing starts are now a third of their 2.27 million-unit peak in January 2006. The housing market, the Achilles heel of the recovery from the 2007-09 recession, is slowly healing.

Sales have been creeping up and the house price decline has bottomed, with a tightening supply of properties on the market raising prices in some metropolitan areas. In addition, homebuilder sentiment touched a six-year high in September.

Home building is expected to add to gross domestic product growth this year for the first time since 2005.  Though residential construction accounts for only about 2.5 percent of GDP, economists estimate that for every new house built, at least three new jobs are created.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

# 20 ...obviously inarticulate....

I love it when a vice presidential candidate--ohh, any ol' vice presidential candidate--refers to his/her presidential candidate as "obviously inarticulate in making this point" about the 47% of Americans whose votes will go to Obama because these voters are rely on government handouts. Thank you, Paul Ryan. 

Ryan went on to say that Romney likely meant that, under the Obama presidency, dependency on the government is up because the economy is struggling.

My only slight concern at this point is that, after SO many inane comments, Romney is still only five or so points beyond Obama. Of course, a whole bunch of a lot of Romney supporters (weakly supportive though they may be) will not become Obama voters under any circumstances (as is true in the opposite direction as well). 

Romney can depend on a small but solid base of votes even if he puts on a Claribel suit, a pointy motley hat, and a big red nose, and squirts seltzer at babies.

The overall popular vote for each candidate is still close.  There are two significant changes, however. The percentage of undecided voters is moving, by now may have actually moved, down to single digits. 

That leaves fewer swing votes for Romney to convince that, yes, after a four year hiatus for intelligence, it is time for a clown to be president once again.  The polls on the swing states show where those swing voters seem to be moving: to Obama.  Today, polls in Virginia have indicated that more voters support Obama there than support Romney.

I'm finding it difficult to get information on the Voter Suppression drives in seventeen states, however.  If they are successful, and if court challenges cannot be heard and the judgments implemented before November 6, the voter-suppression can change the results in closely contested states.  I'm not yet worried about it, but I'd really like some progress reports, if there are any, about what's going on. 

In the meantime, I have offered advice to President Obama, when we sent in a political contribution to his campaign last week:
(1) Don't be the one attacking Romney/Ryan.  (2) Let others in the administration and in the Democratic Party be the attack dogs.  (3) Come out positively on what you can do in a second term, especially if the GOP is turned out of the House and loses some seats in the Senate. 

I'm not holding my breath or sitting at the computer waiting to hear from him. Y'all enjoy now. 

Monday, September 17, 2012

# 19 Recent Polls in Battleground States

Barring some major problem currently unforeseen--and barring really successful Voter Repression drives in seventeen states--I still say, Obama is heading for a large Electoral victory. Please note that Red states have tended to provide Romney with a stronger voter majority than Blue states have given Obama.  In other words, Romney's holding close to Obama in national polls may be the result of his polling better in states that he will likely win, whereas Obama's 'victory margins' are closer in states that Obama will likely win.  Hence, the total Romney popular vote will be closer than the electoral tally.
-----     -----     -----

from Yahoo! News:

According to a new set of NBC/Wall Street Journal/Marist polls, Obama is now leading Romney by 7 points in Ohio and 5 points in Florida and Virginia, and the RealClearPolitics polling average right now has Obama up by 4.2 percentage points in Ohio, 1.3 points in Florida, and 0.4 points in Virginia.

A Philadelphia Inquirer poll released Saturday has Obama leading Romney in Pennsylvania, 50 percent to 39 percent, reports Politico.

“Following the conventions, Obama’s favorability rating has increased by 3 points, while his unfavorable rating has decreased by 6 points. Opinions of Romney have improved slightly following the conventions, but he still has a net negative personal popularity rating among voters in state, with 46 percent favorable/48 percent unfavorable rating.”

Politico also reports on an internal Republican poll that has Romney behind by 4 points in Ohio, not as bad as his 7-point deficit in the NBC/Wall Street Journal/Marist polls but behind nonetheless.

The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll of likely voters has Obama widening his advantage to 7 points, a gap that’s been increasing since the Democratic convention. "What that really means is that Obama is in good shape," said Ipsos pollster Julia Clark.

“Thursday's online poll also found far more registered voters preferred the incumbent's policies and approach on taxes (41 percent picked Obama, 30 percent Romney), healthcare (44 percent Obama, 28 percent Romney) and Social Security (39 percent Obama, 27 percent Romney),” Reuters reported. “Asked which of the candidates had a better plan, policy or approach to the war on terrorism, more registered voters again favored Obama: 39 percent to Romney's 25 percent.” (Note that the poll was taken two days after the attack on the US consulate in Libya.)

One sleeper poll that may have particular importance given the tension between the US and Israel over drawing a “red line” regarding Iran’s nuclear facilities: Obama has extended his lead among registered Jewish voters to 70-25 percent, according to unreleased Gallup daily tracking poll data reported by BuzzFeed.

“The data, obtained through a Democratic source, shows Obama...on par with his 2008 performance at this point when he led 69-25 over John McCain in Gallup polling,” reports BuzzFeed.

Two daily tracking polls out Saturday show just how close the race is: Gallup had Obama up by a point while Rasmussen gives Romney a 2-point edge.  [[RRW's Note: the Rasmussen Poll has consistently this year and in 2008 shown Republican numbers better than other national/statewide polls]].

Meanwhile, the number of undecided voters continues to shrink to just 5-6 percent as people become more fully engaged with the campaign now that the conventions are over and Election Day approaches.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

# 18 North Carolina Moves Blue

...or not.  Here's what I hope will be the FINAL take on Ryan's Ruminations on His Run Time. It makes the point, though: if you can't trust a person on such a seemingly inconsequential "fact," what happens if he has to convey info on important matters?  It IS a matter of credibility. 
-----     -----     -----

When Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan said during an August radio interview that he once ran a marathon in less than three hours, North Carolina runner Bill Walker was impressed, but wanted more details.

The 63-year-old attorney, who has run four sub-three-hour marathons since college, posted a simple question on a message board for LetsRun.com, a national online forum for runners. "In an Aug. 22 interview by Hugh Hewitt, Representative Ryan said he had run a marathon in 'two hour and fifty something,'" Walker wrote on the message board. "Does anyone know the marathon and the year?"

In little time, hundreds of skeptical runners on the message board started questioning Ryan's claim that his best marathon time was "two hour and fifty something." The thread went viral. The day after Walker posted his question, Runner's World writer Scott Douglas started examining it. Turns out Ryan never ran a marathon in that time; a campaign spokesman was forced to walk back the comment.
And it all started with one question on a message board.

"I just wanted to know," Walker said in an interview posted Wednesday on LetsRun.com. "If he had really run a marathon in that range, I would be impressed because I know the effort that goes into a sub-three-hour marathon. But, if he was lying or really stretching the truth, I thought that would be significant since he had just been nominated to run for Vice-President on the Republican ticket."   (emphasis added).

Walker says he is a registered Republican, but will be voting for President Barack Obama in November.

# 17 Up to Date the Swing States

From Rick Klein, Amy Walter, Richard Coolidge & Sherisse Pham [ABC News, Yahoo! News]

For all the talk of polls, and where President Obama and challenger Mitt Romney stand nationally, the 2012 presidential election will be decided in eight battleground states: Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Wisconsin, Ohio, Virginia, New Hampshire, and Florida.

The current state of the electoral college map must be a difficult one for Romney to look at -- all eight of those swing states voted for Obama four years ago. When you zoom in a bit, little Ohio is just enormous in 2012. If Ohio's 18 electoral votes go to Obama, it would be almost impossible for Romney to win; if he lost Ohio, the Republican candidate would have to take just about every other battleground state to get to the White House.

There is no indication that the Romney campaign is even competing in Michigan and Pennsylvania, states that the Romney folks once said they could make some inroads because of the demographic makeup. Michigan and Pennsylvania are currently not solidly Democratic, but instead lean Democratic.

And neither candidate has advertised in the tossup state of Wisconsin. Romney will be the first to play in the Badger State on Wednesday, and we are curious to see what the Obama campaign does. Obama does not have the same amount of money as Republicans. In order to expand the electoral college map, the campaign has to prioritize its goals, i.e. do they give up on North Carolina, which leans Republican, to defend themselves in Wisconsin, and hence cut off every path to victory for Romney?

Now if Romney can get either Michigan or Wisconsin to go red, it would be a very different ball game. All the small states would become very important because both campaigns want to avoid a 269-269 electoral vote split. That's why all the principal players visited tiny New Hampshire to court its 4 electoral votes.

But in a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll, Obama not only got a post-convention bounce, more respondents also said they trust the president is better at handling the economy than Romney would be. And you can't win these swing states -- especially a place like Ohio and its 18 electoral votes -- if voters don't think you can do a better job on the economy.

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

# 16 A Bird in the Hand is Worth a +ur@ on the Ballot

from Chris Moody, Yahoo! News:
Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, a congressman from Wisconsin, will begin running television ads for his congressional re-election campaign, the Associated Press reports:
Contracts formalized Tuesday with at least one Milwaukee television station show that Ryan's congressional ads will start airing Wednesday morning and go initially for two weeks. Ryan's congressional campaign manager confirmed that ads defending the seat will run but said additional details would come later.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney tapped Ryan to be his running mate in August. Ryan is simultaneously running for the vice presidency and his Wisconsin House seat.

This has happened before: Joe Biden was on the Delaware ballot as VP candidate and as incumbent for his
Senate seat in 2008.  It's illegal in some states.  Still, it might be a bit disconcerting to have to consider voting twice for him in his Wisconsin district, especially if the word gets out that voters can vote for him only for one office. What's that you say? ... Well, maybe his supporters don't know that.  And this IS one of the ways that rumors can start.

/RPW
 

Sunday, September 9, 2012

# 15 I didn't tell you there would be Math; or, Romney's Voodoo Economics

# 15

Mitt Romney has made two statements recently that are either a change of mind or a rephrasing to hide a backtracking of his own ideas.  He may also be trying to confuse the American voter. In this last, I suspect he's succeeding.


1)  As president Romney would work to repeal "ObamaCare" (which term I use positively), and would replace it with "RmoneyCare" (which term I guess I just created), which would include some of ObamaCare's provisions...including coverage for patients with pre-existing conditions and coverage enabling both young and adult children (age to be determined) to continue being covered by their parents' health plans. Those are newly added proivsions to Romney's platform, reinstating some of the provisions that would be eliminated if ObamaCare were to be repealed. They are also provisions similar to those in the Massachusetts law approved while Romney was governor. 

Has he begun to rethink his opposition to his own Massachusetts health care law?  Is he moving away from the Ultra-Conservatives in his own base who want nothing to do with anything that resembles any part of ObamaCare?  Is he trying to appear to move toward the political center in order to attract some independent voters?  Will he be able to rescue his own candidacy from its current position tied to the tracks while the train is approaching?

Not likely. His Ultra-Conservative base in not a base at all, but a fragmented group of ideologues united mainly by their opposition to Obama and ObamaCare.  They have not been strong Romney supporters, and this most recent Romney move is not likely to increase their fondness for him.


2) He said that he won't lower taxes on the rich.  He doesn't have to.  All he has to do is NOT repeal the Bush tax cuts, and they get to keep what was already approved under dubya.  The rich pay no less and they pay no more. However, Romney also proposed a 20% tax cut for "all Americans."  While that proposal doesn't lower the tax rate, it does lower the amount of money taxpayers have to pay.

What happens, however, is that rich people and poor people would each pay 20% fewer dollars in taxes under the Romney proposal.  The rich would pay much less actual money (proportionately) than would poorer people: same tax rates as each had been paying before the proposed Romney cut, but proportionately fewer dollars.  Romney argued that his plan would in effect lower taxes for middle class Americans while keeping tax rates the same for wealthy Americans. 

What Romney is actually doing is equivalent both to lowering the absolute tax rate, and also the tax rate that the rich pay compared to the poor.   An example follows:

-----     -----    

Example:
You net-earn $30,000 annually, and pay $3,000 in taxes.  That's a 10% tax rate.  Say instead that you net-earn $300,000 annually and pay $108,000.  That's a 36% tax rate. It may actually be higher, but that doesn't matter; if it is higher, the dollar difference is even more egregious.

Say that Romney's proposal takes effect.  The $30,000 wage earner saves $600 in taxes (20% of the $3,000 tax bill from the previous paragraph). This wage earner thus pays $2,400 in taxes against a $30,000 net income; or, an 8% tax rate.

With Romney's plan, the $300,000 wage earner would save $21,600 (20% of the $108,000 tax bill).  This wage earner would pay $86,400 in taxes; or, 28.8% tax rate. So, actually, Romney would be lowering the wealthy wage earner's tax rate, from 36% to 28.8%.  But that isn't the worst part. The wealthy would pay proportionately lower taxes in absolute dollar terms.

The bottom line is that Mitt Romney is comparing tax rates with tax dollars.  He's comparing apples to bricks.  If you decide to bite on his proposal, be sure to choose the more edible metaphor (hint: the apples).


Tuesday, September 4, 2012

# 14 Radix Malorum Est Cupiditas

That's not really the best title, but I thought it might catch your attention.  "The root of evil is greed."  Greed is operating in much of the background to the Republican emphasis on tax cuts for the uber-rich, and so greed is a motivating factor for what's happening more directly in this election.

There's a lot of money pouring into the GOP treasury, and probably a lot more not pouring in there but still being used to support Republican candidates.  How's that possible?  Thank you, Supreme Court.  In addition to what the Republican Party is garnering in contributions--and for which it must identify itself in political advertisements and identify its source in its periodic fundraising reports--there's likely to be much more coming in from SuperPacs, private and corporate ads, and non-GOP-directly financed materials.

These additional financial resources do not have to be identified, and the Republican Party does not have to acknowledge knowing anything about them, and certainly does not have to indicate approval.  Thus, these other financial resources can be used to spew venom and lies and more lies, and the GOP can just sit back and watch the intended muddling of fact and falsehood.

A potentially horrible example has appeared, and has apparently become popular, among the more conservative regions of our country.  Dinesh D'Souza (president of King's College in New York, and long-time conservative political and financial author), and Gerald Molen (known for his work on "Schindler's List" and "Jurassic Park") have collaborated on a pseudo-documentary (my term) describing their views of what life will be like if Obama is re-elected. 

The title: "2016." After a small premiere in mid-July in Houston, the film recently was appearing in nearly 1,100 theaters around the nation, but mainly in southern states. It grossed over $6 million in its first month of release. It has seemed to resonate among the more gullible (my view) and less rational (my view) of our fellow and sister Americans.

I don't have a clue how lasting its effect may be.  But it is representative of the kinds of materials that can now be dumped with impunity, on a possibly-unsuspecting public, by those who have the financial resources without the accountability.

We should also be concerned about the Voter Registration Suppression Drives that several Republican governors and Republican-controlled state legislatures are developing.  It may already be too late for court action to stop these movements completely, and especially to reverse them in states where they may have already been approved (though I believe a Texas court has overturned the recent Texas suppression decision). It is clear, however, that such laws and procedures are aimed at reducing minority participation in the election. 

I can't even begin to express my concern at the possibility that these drives might succeed just enough to turn the election results toward the GOP.  I am counting on Americans to wake up to what the Republican party is doing, so that Obama will be re-elected; the Democrats will retain control of the Senate, and perhaps even increase its majority; and the voters will reverse the 2010 Republican victory with a resounding Democratic majority in the House of Representatives.   

If the Democratic nominees and party faithful can get the message out, I still see Obama winning big in November.  That can change of course: money, and lies, and innuendoes--and Voter Suppression drives-- might work their Dementor-like spells, sucking the soul out of the country.  We cannot afford another four years, much less eight years, of a dubya-doppelganger administration.      /RPW

# 13 It's Not Ryan's Recall at Fault

After this evening’s Post # 13, I’ll get back to posting my own thoughts on how this election is shaping up, and what (I see) are the major influences.  But Walter Shapiro (below) really sums up Paul Ryan’s difficulties superbly.  The title above is mine, however.  A person who stretches truth--or just plain lies--for any reason other than humor is not to be trusted with leading this country.  /RPW
 
Walter Shapiro's Yahoo! News column examines what we know about the character and personalities of the 2012 candidates. Shapiro, who is covering his ninth presidential campaign, is also a special correspondent for the New Republic.

Saturday, September 1, 2012

# 12 Truthiness in Speechifying

Stephen Colbert claims tohave created the word "truthiness" (which apparently is to appear in dictionaries near you next year), and he may well have.  In his contexts, the word seems to mean, "bordering on, almost, near truth, but not quite...and actually missing the mark considerably" [definition by RPW].  Now you can see why "truthiness" is so much easier a term to use.

Paul Ryan has been the subject of many media stories as a result of the truthiness of the "facts" [sic] he used in his VP nomination acceptance speech.  I need to select but one example to represent Ryan's distortions: Ryan claimed that the President had spoken to workers at a GM plant in Ryan's home state, in 2008, promising that if he were elected president that plant would still be in operation in "one hundred years." Ryan then pointed out that, even though Obama was elected, the plant was closed. The truth (not truthiness) is that the plant was closed in 2008, before Obama was elected, and while dubya was president.

That inaccuracy (mistake, misspoken, falsehood, truthiness?) was roundly attacked by just about every media outlet.

The most single damning criticism, however, was: "to anyone paying the slightest bit of attention to facts, Ryan’s speech was an apparent attempt to set the world record for the greatest number of blatant lies and misrepresentations slipped into a single political speech."

That was from Sally Kohn of FoxNews.com.  Finally, "fair and balanced."

Here's the problem, however.  Too many voters seem not to care.  If they already agree with the people who make such outrageous truthiness-es, they aren't going to change their mind.  If anything, they will be reinforced that the the other side just simply has it in for Ryan, or Romney, or Rove, omy.  

So all the GOP has to do is to repeat, and repeat, and repeat the mistakes and the falsehoods to retain supporters and believers.  And for this they need money.  Lots of money.  Money to flood the airwaves and online with these falsehoods. 

And that's another problem.  They have it. I'll address it in my next post, # 13.





Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/30/paul-ryans-speech-in-three-words/#ixzz25F6GyiWO
Sally Kohn of FoxNews.com